Tag: nevada

  • Some States Want Bail Bond Reform

    Some States Want Bail Bond Reform

    Someone said, “justice delayed is justice denied.” If legal relief is possible, but not delivered promptly, it is the same as no justice at all.

    For America’s indigent, justice has been denied for decades.

    Lyndon Johnson pushed Congress to approve the Bail Reform Act of 1966. The believed the law would be a model for states which failed to modify their bail and bond policies.

    “Too often, we lock up people for months and years — even before getting their day in court,” Johnson told Capitol Hill lawmakers.

    Johnson’s legislation required federal judges to review an individual’s neighborhood ties and criminal history and measure against hazards of pretrial freedom.

    Signing the bill, Johnson praised the bill and called it the “door of a new era” in criminal justice.

    Five decades later, few states have passed the finish line. Using cash bond is still the primary practice and comes with dire consequences for persons too poor to buy their freedom.

    Only a small number of states eliminated monetary bail. Some are thinking of changes and others look the other way. States have been hesitant to own reform in the bail system, and multiple lawsuits have been filed to trigger changes.

    In November, Dennis Herrera, a San Francisco City Lawyer called for the abolition of cash bill for indigent defendants and said he would not defend the city against a lawsuit filed which challenges the requirement of bail before arraignment.

    New Mexico

    Also in November, New Mexico called for a constitutional amendment to modify the state bail system. The Amendment would give New Mexico judges the power to deny bail when prosecutors give evidence a defendant is too dangerous to be free while waiting for trial. The bill prohibits confinement of offenders who aren’t found to be threatening or a flight risk.

    Improving New Mexico’s bail arrangement is part of a broader campaign to change criminal justice policies disproportionately harming the poor.

    Nevada

    The cash bail system hasn’t changed in Nevada. When a person is arrested in The Silver State, they are booked into jail. A judge determines a bond amount ranging from $100 to hundreds of thousands — if not more. The Arrestee’s ability to pay is not considered. Neither is the potential of the arrestee being a flight risk.

    Some bail bond companies try to keep some humanity about their work. “We do the best we can to help our clients, but our hands are tied by the courts,” said Adam Plumer.

  • Potential Change in Nevada’s Bail System Could End Discrimination

    Potential Change in Nevada’s Bail System Could End Discrimination

    Significant changes within Nevada’s bonding system could be in effect statewide soon. Once that occurs,  Nevada shall be discriminating. That’s not a evil thing. The pretrial liberation program, being examined in several Nevada counties, is radically different. The courts have ordered an attempt be made to lesson bail inequities. Nevada has entered the movement by permitting testing of the new method.

    Most individuals are acquainted with how bond is presently managed. A judge determines a dollar figure determined by the grimness of the offense someone is accused of. As months can pass before a trial takes place, detainees who can pay bail may be released by handing over cash or working with a licensed agent. Indigent detainees are stuck behind bars and stand to lose jobs, homes and families.

    The new method will ascertain if an arrestee meets bonding criteria or is freed premised on the prospect of their keeping their court date. Detainees are questioned and their release is based on their answers.

    There are various reasons why a new system may help justice function better.

    Bond outlay determined by the crime does not consider the capability of the accused to pay. This leaves the justice system favoring the wealthy over the destitute. Drug dealers, commonly with piles of cash, can bond out despite being a danger or flight risk.

    “Our judges traditionally set bail blindly,” Taylor Barton, a Las Vegas bail bonds agent said.

    “Someone comes to court; bond is determined and often the individual waits in jail for their day in court date. The jurists don’t distinguish if the detainee is a danger to society or not. Many people lose their jobs and homes because they’ve been forced to remain in jail.”

    A test application in Clark, Washoe and White Pine counties has seen judges assessing pretrial release determined by evidence and risk evaluation instead. There is no guarantee the application will be used in additional jurisdictions, but it can be expected. Courts in various states have already adopted the program.

    Nevada’s risk evaluation involves questioning whether the detainee has been detained “numerous” times for drug or alcohol-related offenses. The answers are scored from 0-11 and the answers can be weighted for various purposes, such as the offender being a gang member.

    The biggest pushback has come from bail bondsmen who may lose a significant portion of their profit as more persons are released without bail.

    Nevada’s judicial authorities have been prudent to build a system founded on input from specialists as well as direct comments from the model program.